Archive for December, 2006

My Investment Philosophy and Trading Strategies

Sunday, December 31st, 2006

[This page was written many years ago and my trading strategies have evolved with my experiences since then. However some of the main ideas here still hold true ...]

My Investment Philosophy:

My investment philosophy is: stock investing is a competition, participated by millions of people including professionals and amatures alike, all trying to make as much money as possible.In reality only some people can "win", i.e., to beat the market. Just like in any competition, to win consistently and to win big, one must

  1. understand how the system works;
  2. have a strategy;
  3. work hard,
  4. take risks and
  5. have good luck!

In other words, it takes a lot! So much so that one has to become a (quasi-) professional. In fact he or she has to be a very good professional as 85% of the professionally-managed mutual funds in US under-perform the S&P 500 index!

Of the items listed above, the first two are the key factors that separate a professional from a gambler. Without having a good understanding of the stock market and without a trading strategy, one is in fact either doing "random walking" at the mercy of the volatile market or, to be worse, "random trading" which can be disastrous. In either case, he/she will most likely end up a loser, as many individual investors, myself included, had experienced in the dot-com era.

How the Market Works:

On the market, Warren Buffet said it the best: In the short run, it's a voting machine, in the long run, it's a weighing machine. It's easy to understand the second part ("the weighing machine"), but it is the first part of the statement that is extremely important for individual investors: do not get on the wrong side of the maddening crowd, or you may be crushed!

On Market Efficiency, Random Walk Theory, And Risk:

I don't believe that the market is efficient. By doing extensive researches and using innovated technologies, I believe that one can out-perform the market.

My definition of risk is simply the probability of incurring financial loss and the magnitude of such potential loss if I invest in some company. The stock is the least risky if, based on actual data and careful reasoning, the stock is under valued and/or is showing strong momentum.

My Investment Objectives:

Any strategy depends on the objectives. My objectives are to:

  1. produce realistic returns that consistently beat the overall market;
    1. Average annual return of 16.5% vs. 6% expected for S&P 500 in next five years.
  2. avoids large losses;
    1. Minimum annual return: -20% vs. historical -30% for S&P 500
  3. bring joy instead of stress to my life.

The strategy also has to be such that it is repeatable when applied on different stocks and in different market situations; Ideally it has to be scalable to work with large funds.

My Investment Strategy:

The strategy that I use the most is a data-driven and adaptive trading strategy.

  1. Make every trade based on actual data
    1. No random trading. And No wishful thinking.
    2. Buy only if the following is true: "This stock is most likely going up based on actual data."
    3. Sell stocks only if the following is true: "This stock is most likely going down based on new data".
  2. Simplified decision making:
    1. only try to predict price direction but not price targets nor the time frame for the targets will be reached.
    2. For the same reason, do not trade options.
  3. Hold positions tight as long as the ongoing trend holds:
    1. Most gains are realised by holding the positions for as long as the trend continues. This can last for days or years.
  4. The loss is minimized by cutting loss.
  5. Use hedging to reduce the systemic risk.
Stock Selection:

The strategy above has the following implications when it comes to selecting stocks to go long or go short:

  1. Favor stocks that show relative strength against the market or sector it is in. Avoid the laggards.
  2. Favor stocks that are dirt cheap but shows sign of strengthening.
  3. Favor stocks that are showing strong up trend;
  4. Favor stocks that are dominant in their markets and have pricing power;
  5. Favor stocks with predictable behaviors. Avoid stocks that tend to give surprises;
  6. Favor companies that only provide one or few products or services that I can more or less keep track of. Avoid those with complex and multiple revenue sources.
  7. Favor stocks that are high in liquidity. Avoid those that are thinly traded. Avoid penny stocks.

I periodically scan all stocks that are traded in the US to find names that meet my valuation or technical criteria.

Investor, Trader or Speculator?

To me, an investor is a glorified trader. For an investor to be successful, he/she must first be a good trader. A trader can be very successful if he/she does it the right way. An "investor" can loss everything if he/she doesn't trade right.

I don't buy the "investing-for-the-long-term" approach because (1) I believe it is only applicable for investing in diversified funds and (2) that I am not smart enough to identify and value the true long-term winners.

Sometimes I am a speculator too, just to add some excitement to my otherwise dull investing experience, hopeful that I may be lucky. Occasionally I put small amount of money in companies that are under financial stress, i.e., in immediate danger of going under, with hope of being turned around. However I run away quickly if the market doesn't go the way I speculate it would.

I don't do day-trading. However if I realize that a mistake has been made, I may close my positions on the same day, even if at a loss.

On Technical Analysis (TA):

I do use technical analysis to time my purchase and sale, as well as selecting stocks. However I only use several simple TA charts that I can explain. These include moving averages, relative strength and money supply. I also pay attention to several easy-to-understand and simple-to-spot technical patterns, such as header-and-shoulder, cup-with-a-handle, double top(bottom) breakout, etc.

However if I understand the company's business very well or if the investment is for long-term value appreciation, the fundamentals will over-rule the technical signals. In these situations, the long-range TA signals are of more importance.

On Diversification:

There are two ways of diversification to reduce the portfolio risk: 1) put your eggs in many buskets. 2) Put them in one or few baskets, but do take special care of them!

I like the second approach, i.e. , putting a good percentage (>50%) of the portfolio in one or two stocks that I've studies very carefully. And I continue to monitor them closely.

The Past Performance:

So far the strategy has served me well, as shown in my portfolio performance since 2002, the year I started stock investing seriously. Prior to 2002, I traded "randomly" without a clear strategy which, unsurprisingly, resulted in erratic and dismal returns.

The Limitations:

The strategy is not without flaws. It requires active management (read: time and effort). It does not offer enough protection from a potential sudden market collapse (as I am not very good at hedging). And it is not proven very scalable yet.

Disclaimer:

This is a summary of my own experience in trading stocks. I put it here in the hope that it might be useful for others also. You should however be aware that trading stocks involves a lot of risks and that no single strategy applies to all people. So use it at your own risk.

My Investment Performance

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

Last Updated: The end of 2006

Performance Summary:

  • Return for the year: up 64.3% vs. 15.4% for S&P 500.
  • Compounded return since 2002: 659% vs. 34.3% for S&P 500.
  • Compound annual return since 2002: 50.0%, vs. 6.1% for S&P 500.

perf011.PNGperf021.PNG

Definitions: The return used above is the pre-tax "total return", i.e., the sum of price appreciation and reinvested dividend, net of commissions and margin cost. The returns for S&P500, the benchmark, include annual dividends of about 1.76%.

Next Update: the end of Q1, 2007.

Book: Essential BHP Security

Friday, December 29th, 2006

It seems an essential book to read for building a secure PHP-based web site: Essential PHP Security . Sample chapters: Chapter 2, and Chapter 4.
The author's web site is here.

0 comments

StumbleUpon: StumbledUpon: The 10 Tcf/year Supply Gap

Wednesday, December 27th, 2006

From EnergyPulse, Andrew Weissman, Editor-in-Chief & Publisher, EnergyBusinessWatch.com, writes about the coming crisis in US gas supply and comment on why there hasn't been any urgency to deal with the problem. Among the reasons:

  1. Accelerated depletion of existing gas reserves that are not being replaced by new findings;
  2. Too much natural gas has been used for power generation;
  3. Out-dated prediction tools and under-funded government research organizations.

Holiday Greetings!

Sunday, December 24th, 2006


Best Wishes For

. . . . . . . A Merry Christmas and

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Prosperous New Year!

Whom Goldman Sachs Has Been Hiring

Thursday, December 21st, 2006

I cannot verify it, but it seems that the investment banks are hiring a lot of math and IT people from other countries, more than those majoring in economics and business, including MBAs. [One possible explanation: they may have hired many other business majors, but theose people are Americans.] [Source: Wenxuecity.com and MyVisaJobs.Com]

???2005??????477?h1b visa, ????top h1b visa sponsors??26?. ?477???????, ??, ????125?, Business????49?:

Occupation_Group Goldman Sachs & Co.
IT 175
Math 125
Economics 120
Business 49
Manager 7
Others 1

...

?????, ???????,????,????, ????????????. ???, ?????, ???????????????????. ??, ????????????, ??????, ???????????, ??????????????. ??????????????. ????????????????????, ?????????????????????, ????, ?????????, ???????????MBA?????, ?????????????.

Cisco Bids to Control IPTV

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

Link: Cisco bids to control IPTV :

Cisco has virtually re-invented IPTV services by dropping key elements of the IPTV experience – VoD, network PVR, fast channel change and packet re-transmission – down a layer into the network layer, sitting on Cisco routers and servers in the network.

It's said this technology would improve the bit error ratio that is a common problem in all current IPTV solutions.

PNG Facts: Energy Industry

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

Oil - production:

50,000 bbl/day (January 2006 est.)

Oil - consumption:

18,000 bbl/day (January 2006 est.)

Oil - exports:

NA bbl/day

Oil - imports:

NA bbl/day

Oil - proved reserves:

170 million bbl (2005 est.)

Natural gas - production:

140 million cu m (2003 est.)

Natural gas - consumption:

140 million cu m (2003 est.)

Natural gas - exports:

0 cu m (2001 est.)

Natural gas - imports:

0 cu m (2001 est.)

Natural gas - proved reserves:

345.5 billion cu m (2005)

Source: CIA - "The World Factbook"

StumbleUpon: Story of Macro Hedge Fund Manager Peter Thiel

Monday, December 4th, 2006

A good story at Bloomberg Online on Peter Thiel, a former Stanford student who made a killing on PayPal and now heads his own macro hedge fund Clarium Capital Management LLC, with $2.1bn assets under its management.
He is smart and successful, but gambling on world (macro) economy as he does is very risky no matter how smart his analysts are. Plus, he "uses leverage to juice returns, typically borrowing $3-$8 for every dollar under management". If they are right, they will earn big money as he has done, but I wouldn't hand my money to him (or any hedge fund manager).

StumbleUpon: Google Functions

Friday, December 1st, 2006

Very interesting built-in functions are made available in Google Documents and Spreadsheets. Stock quotes and other information can be dynamically loaded into a spreadsheet, which in turn can be turned into a web page. Below is the result of my trying out of these functions:

<the spreadsheet was lost when the blog was ported from Blogger by live writer>
 
I think this, and together with many other online Office tools, is something very significant for the future of computing: the so-called Network PC and network computing that were promised in 1990s are finally making their way to ordinary people's desktop! No wonder that Microsoft is so nervous and that Yahoo is in trouble!